When I first saw
Sydney Sweeney’s now-infamous American Eagle ad, I didn’t laugh. I didn’t even
roll my eyes. I felt angry. The video plays on the words “genes” and “jeans,”
with Sweeney a blonde-haired, blue-eyed actress saying: “Genes are passed down…
eye colour, hair colour… my jeans are blue.” To some, it was “cute.” To me, as
a Black person, it felt like a slap in the face.
That ad doesn’t
exist in a vacuum. It exists in a world where whiteness is constantly
celebrated, while Blackness our resistance, our features, our history is
policed, punished, or turned into a punchline. I’m writing this not from
America, but from Britain. And still, I feel the sting. Because what happens in
the US rarely stays there. American whiteness is global. It sets standards that
travel through advertising, fashion, celebrity culture, and social media. We
consume these messages daily in the UK. We live in their aftermath. The idea of
“good genes” being synonymous with whiteness, with blue eyes and blonde hair,
isn’t just American it echoes through school corridors here, in casting
decisions, beauty trends, and assumptions about what is “normal,” desirable, or
professional.
Let’s talk about
that phrase “good genes.” It’s not innocent. It’s not clever. It has a history
soaked in blood. In the US, it was used to justify slavery, to promote the
forced sterilisation of Black, Indigenous, and disabled people, to build
systems that categorised people as “fit” or “unfit” to reproduce. Eugenics
wasn’t a fringe belief it was taught in schools, endorsed by governments, and
applied in law. The very foundations of American progress were shaped by
beliefs about who deserved to pass on their genes and who didn’t. And the
belief in genetic superiority didn’t stop in the US. It found deadly expression
in Nazi Germany, where “good genes” came to mean white skin, blonde hair, and
blue eyes. That ideology killed millions Jews, Roma, disabled people, and
others who didn’t fit the violent, narrow idea of purity.
In 2025, we now
have a white actress in a denim campaign laughing about “genes” as a marketing
gimmick. It’s not clever wordplay. It’s erasure. It’s the rebranding of
historical violence into a fashion campaign. What she says and what her
whiteness represents does not exist outside of this context. Especially when we
know it’s not her first brush with controversy. In 2022, Sweeney faced backlash
when her family hosted a MAGA-themed party, complete with Blue Lives Matter
gear and Trump merchandise. She didn’t engage the criticism. Her fans rushed to
defend her, insisting she shouldn’t be punished for her family’s views. But
silence is never neutral especially when you benefit from what that silence
protects.
Now we’ve
learned she’s a registered Republican voter in Florida a state that has become
synonymous with voter suppression, anti-Black legislation, and attacks on
LGBTQ+ and immigrant communities. These aren't distant political choices they’re
active alignments. Whether conscious or not, they signal something. And when
the backlash to this ad came, Sweeney said nothing. No reflection. No
accountability. She didn’t have to. Because whiteness shields her from
consequence. Black celebrities don’t get that grace. We speak out, we’re
“angry.” We challenge something, we’re “too political.” We misstep, we’re
cancelled. But Sweeney? She gets a stock bump. More brand deals.
After the ad
went viral, American Eagle’s stock rose 20%. Not because the jeans were
spectacular but because controversy sells. Donald Trump praised Sydney Sweeney.
Senator Ted Cruz reposted the ad, calling it “brilliant.” These are people
who’ve spent their careers dismissing racial justice, mocking Black pain, and
actively working to dismantle equity. And they love this ad. That should tell
us everything. They see themselves in it. They see a world where whiteness is
unchallenged, where nostalgia for “better times” can be smuggled in through a
pretty face and a pun. It’s comfort food for white fragility. It’s a nod to
supremacy wrapped in denim.
This isn’t just
about Sweeney. It’s about the systems that allow white celebrities to dance on
the edges of racism, profit from it, and retreat. Meanwhile, the rest of us
carry the fallout. We feel the weight. We know what “good genes” has meant for
our communities. We know how our features our hair, our skin, our names have
been held against us. And we’re not being sensitive. We’re being honest.
This ad hurt
because it reminded us, once again, that our trauma is considered marketable.
Our histories are punchlines. Our bodies are never the standard, only the
target. It hurt because we know what it means to be told, again and again, that
we’re not the ones with “good genes.” That our beauty, our bloodlines, our
survival are always somehow less than. It hurt because it keeps happening, and
they keep getting away with it.
I thought about
my own ancestors. Stolen. Enslaved. Silenced. Sterilised. Erased. I thought
about how they never got to celebrate their genes. How they were told they were
a threat, not a legacy. And then I thought about how white features thin lips,
blonde hair, blue eyes are praised, replicated, made profitable, while ours are
shamed or appropriated. We’re told to be quiet, to move on. But I won’t.
This essay is my
refusal to be silent. It’s my declaration that this kind of harm cannot be
allowed to pass unchallenged, just because it was dressed up in denim. I will
not support brands that exploit Black pain for profit. I will not idolise
celebrities who align themselves—directly or indirectly—with systems that harm
my people. I will not be gaslit into believing that racism is ever just a joke.
If you’ve felt
the same way angry, tired, unseen you’re not alone. You’re not overreacting.
You’re living in a world where harm is often aestheticised and history is
conveniently forgotten. But we remember. We carry the weight. We keep speaking
truth. And we refuse to let it be repackaged as entertainment.
This isn’t just
about an ad.
It’s about power.
It’s about whose genes are celebrated.
Whose pain is ignored.
And who gets to profit off the bodies and histories of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment