Diversity and equality programs are
designed to create fairer workplaces, ensuring marginalized groups have equal
access to opportunities. But if we look closer at the UK’s corporate,
political, and educational landscapes, a pattern emerges—these initiatives
disproportionately benefit white women while Black women and other women of colour
remain underrepresented.
How did we get here? Why do white
women seem to gain the most from diversity programs? And what does this mean
for true equality? Let’s break it down.
1. The Feminism That Forgot Black Women
To understand why white women benefit
the most from diversity programs, we have to look at how gender equality
movements have historically operated in the UK. The early feminist
waves—focused on voting rights, workplace equality, and reproductive freedoms—primarily
centered on the experiences of white, middle-class women.
For example, the Equal Pay Act of
1970 was a landmark victory for women’s rights, ensuring women were legally
entitled to the same pay as men for the same work. However, what it didn’t
account for was the racial pay gap. Even today, Black women in the UK earn
significantly less than white women, with research from the Office for National
Statistics (2023) showing that Black African and Black Caribbean women face
some of the lowest median wages across all racial groups.
Who Gets Left Behind?
Feminism that focuses only on gender
and ignores race has led to policies that uplift white women without addressing
the specific struggles faced by women of colour. While white women have made
major strides in politics, business, and media, Black and Asian women continue
to face racial discrimination on top of gender bias.
A 2021 report by The Fawcett
Society found that Black women in the UK are more likely to face
barriers in leadership roles, experience workplace discrimination, and be
overlooked for promotions compared to white women. Despite this, many diversity
initiatives lump all women together, assuming that their challenges are the
same.
This is why programs designed to
support women often end up benefiting white women the most—because they do not consider
the intersectionality of race and gender.
2. Corporate Diversity: A Numbers Game?
One of the most common ways companies
try to address inequality is by setting diversity targets. Many UK companies
have introduced policies to increase the number of women in leadership
positions. But if we take a closer look at who’s actually getting promoted,
it’s predominantly white women.
FTSE 100: More Women, But Who Are They?
The UK government recently celebrated
the fact that 40% of board members in FTSE 100 companies are now women (UK
Government, 2023). While this is an improvement in gender representation, the
problem is that only 1.1% of these women are Black.
This means that while companies can
claim they have improved gender diversity, racial diversity within those gender
initiatives is still severely lacking. The reality is that white women, who
already have more access to education, professional networks, and leadership
opportunities, are the first to benefit from these changes.
The Glass Ceiling vs. The Concrete Ceiling
White women often talk about breaking
the "glass ceiling"—the invisible barriers preventing them from
reaching top positions. But for Black women, the ceiling is not just made of
glass—it’s concrete. While white women may struggle to rise in male-dominated
spaces, they still have racial privilege that gives them greater
access to mentorship, networking, and sponsorship opportunities compared to
Black women.
A 2020 McKinsey report found that
while white women face gender-based discrimination, they are still twice
as likely as Black women to have senior leaders sponsor their careers. In
contrast, Black women report being shut out of these networks, making it harder
for them to climb the corporate ladder.
3. Bias in Hiring and Promotions
Even when Black women enter the
workforce, they often encounter racial and gender biases that white women do
not experience. A 2020 study by the Centre for Social Investigation at Nuffield
College found that Black-sounding names are significantly less likely to
receive interview callbacks compared to white-sounding names with identical
CVs.
"Not a Cultural Fit"—Code for Discrimination?
Once hired, Black women face
additional hurdles in career advancement. Many report being told they are
"not a cultural fit" when they apply for leadership roles—a phrase
often used to mask unconscious racial bias.
A Guardian report in
2021 highlighted how Black women in the UK’s legal profession are
disproportionately stuck in junior roles despite having years of experience.
Meanwhile, white women with similar qualifications are more likely to be
fast-tracked for leadership positions through mentorship and sponsorship
programs.
This is why diversity programs that
focus only on gender fail to address the deeper issue of racial bias in hiring
and promotions.
4. The "Safe Diversity" Choice
Corporations want to appear
progressive, but they also don’t want to challenge the existing power
structures too much. White women are often seen as a "safe" diversity
choice because they represent change without making leadership teams too uncomfortable.
The Media’s Role in Reinforcing "Safe Diversity"
When UK brands or institutions
feature women in leadership campaigns, who do they usually showcase? A white
woman. Even when discussing gender pay gaps or leadership diversity, the face
of these movements is usually white.
This sends a message that diversity
is welcome—but only if it’s within certain racial limits. Black and Asian
women, who might bring different cultural perspectives and experiences, are
often excluded from these mainstream narratives.
5. The Overlooked Reality of Intersectionality
KimberlĂ© Crenshaw’s concept of
intersectionality explains how different forms of discrimination—gender, race,
and class—overlap to create unique experiences of oppression.
For example, a company might proudly
announce that 50% of its leadership is now female. But if all those women are
white, does that truly reflect diversity?
Black women experience both gender
discrimination (like pay gaps and workplace bias) and racial
discrimination(such as microaggressions and being overlooked for promotions).
Yet, diversity initiatives often treat these as separate issues rather than
interconnected ones.
This is why programs that only focus
on one aspect of identity—like gender—end up benefiting those who already
have racial privilege.
6. Lack of Accountability in Diversity Programs
One of the biggest flaws in diversity
programs is the lack of accountability. Many organizations treat diversity as
a box-ticking exercise rather than a genuine commitment to change.
A 2022 CIPD report found that while
many UK companies have diversity hiring policies, there is little
follow-through on ensuring racial inclusion. This means that while white
women are often promoted under these initiatives, Black women remain
disproportionately underrepresented in leadership roles.
Without real accountability—such
as tracking racial disparities in hiring, promotions, and pay gaps—diversity
programs will continue to fail women of colour.
So, What’s the Solution?
If diversity programs are truly about
equality, they need to address racial disparities as well as gender
disparities.
What Needs to Change?
·
Race-Specific Initiatives –
Companies should create programs specifically aimed at Black and ethnic
minority women, rather than assuming one-size-fits-all solutions work.
·
Transparent Promotion Processes –
Employers must publish data on racial disparities in hiring and
promotions to hold themselves accountable.
·
Mentorship for Women of Colour –
Black women need more mentorship and sponsorship opportunities to
help break into leadership roles.
·
Tackling Bias in the Workplace –
Companies need to actively dismantle racial biases in hiring,
performance reviews, and workplace culture.
Final Thoughts
Diversity and equality programs in
the UK have made progress, but they often uplift white women while leaving
Black women behind. If we truly want inclusivity, we must move beyond
gender-only approaches and tackle racial disparities head-on.
Let’s stop treating diversity as
a PR stunt and start making real, systemic changes. Because
until then, the so-called "diversity wins" will continue to be
victories for some, while leaving others in the shadows.
No comments:
Post a Comment